欢迎来到OAJRC平台!
登录 | 注册 | English
期刊目次
加入编委
添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:
Open Access Article
International Journal of Genetics Frontiers. 2020; 1: (1) 2; 5-11 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijgf.20200002.
公安部法医学研究所
广州法医所
*通讯作者: LI Wanshui,单位:公安部法医学研究所;
发布时间: 2020-06-17 总浏览量: 2363
PDF 全文下载 引用本文 收录截图(CNKI-Scholar)
目的 评估DNATyper X19试剂盒在法医学应用中的价值。方法 在这项研究中,我们对374名中国北方汉族个体的遗传多态性进行了调查。结果 在374名华北汉族人群的18个X-STR基因座中共检测到140个等位基因,从228名男性中检测出228个单倍型,多样性为100%。在这项研究中,应用Bonferroni校正进行多次测试后(p = 0.05 / 18),没有标记脱离Hardy-Weinberg平衡,GATA31E08-DXS6797,DXS8377-DXS10079处于连锁不平衡(LD)(p = 0.05 / 153)。多态信息含量(PIC)为0.434-0.908,判别力(DP)为0.432-0.983。男性的综合分辨力为0.99999993,女性为0.999999992。双重病例(CMECduo)的合并平均排除机会为0.999993,三重病例(CMECtrio)为0.999999994。结论 DNATyper X19试剂盒对复杂的父系案件具有潜在价值。
Objective To evaluate the value of DNATyper X19 kit in the forensic application. Methods In this study, we carried out a survey of genetic polymorphism from 374 Northern Chinese Han individuals. Results A total of 140 alleles were detected among the 18 X-STR loci from 374 Northern Chinese Han individuals, 228 haplotypes were detected from the 228 males, the diversity is 100%. No markers departed from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium after applying Bonferroni’s correction for multiple testing (p=0.05/18), GATA31E08-DXS6797, DXS8377-DXS10079 were in linkage disequilibrium (LD) in this study (p=0.05/153). The polymorphism information content (PIC) was 0.434-0.908 and the discrimination power (DP) was 0.432-0.983. The combined discrimination power was 0.99999993 for male and 0.999999992 for female. The combined mean exclusion chance was 0.999993 in duo cases (CMECduo) and 0.999999994 in trio case (CMECtrio). Conclusion s DNATyper X19 kit showed potential value for complicated paternity cases.
[1] Becker D, Rodig H, Augustin C, et al. (2008). Population genetic evaluation of eight X-chromosomal short tandem repeat loci using Mentype Argus X-8 PCR amplification kit.Forensic Science International: Genetics,2 (1) : 69-74.
[2] Hatsch D, Keyser C, Hienne R, et al. (2007). Resolving paternity relationships using X-chromosome STRs and Bayesian networks.Journal of Forensic Sciences,52 (4) : 895-897.
[3] Szibor R, Krawczak M, Hering S, et al. (2003). Use of X linked markers for forensic purposes.International Journal of Legal Medicine,117 (2) : 67-74.
[4] Yu Z L, Sun J, Ding G S, et al. (2018). The application of X-STR: two case reports.Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology,6 (9) : 859-862.
[5] Hundertmark T, Hering S, Edelmann J, et al. (2008). The STR cluster DXS10148–DXS8378–DXS10135 provides a powerful tool for X-chromosomal haplotyping at Xp22.International Journal of Legal Medicine,122 (6) : 489-492.
[6] Edelmann J, Hering S, Augustin C, et al. (2008). Haplotypes and haplotype stability within a 126.6 kb region at Xq28.Forensic Science International: Genetics,1 (1) : 554-556.
[7] Edelmann J, Hering S, Augustin C, et al. (2009). Chromosome X centromere region – haplotype frequencies for different populations.Forensic Science International: Genetics,2 (1) : 398-399.
[8] Ferreira Da Silva I H, Barbosa A G, Azavedo D A, et al. (2010). An X-chromosome penta-plex in two linkage groups: haplotype data in Alagoas and Rio de Janeiro populations from Brazil.Forensic Science International: Genetics,4 (4) : 95-100.
[9] DNA Advisory Board. Quality assurance standards DNA databasing laboratories. (2008)..[9]Forensic Science Communications, 10. https://www2.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/oct2008/standards/2008_10_standards01a.htm., .
[10] SWGDAM Executive Board. (2016) SWGDAM Validation Guidelines for DNA Analysis Methods, posting on www.swgdam.org [12-05].https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/4344b0_813b241e8944497e99b9c45b163b76bd.pdf, .
[11] Tereba A. (1999). Tools for analysis of population statistics.Profiles in DNA, USA: Gene-Press,2 (3) : 14-16.
[12] Ge Jy, Eisenberg A, Budowle B. (2012). Developing criteria and data to determine best options for expanding the core CODIS loci.Investigative Genetics,3 (1) : 1.
[13] Weir B S. (2004). Matching and partially-matching DNA profiles.Journal of Forensic Sciences,49 (5) : 1009-1014.
[14] Ge Jy, Chakraborly R, Eisenberg A J, et al. (2011). Comparisons of familial DNA database searching strategies.Journal of Forensic Sciences,56 (6) : 1448-1456.
[15] Ge Jy, Budowle B, Chakraborly R. (2011). Choosing relatives for DNA identification of missing persons.Journal of Forensic Sciences,56 (s1) : 23-28.
[16] Schneider P M. (2007). Scientific standards for studies in forensic genetics.Forensic Science International,165 (2) : 238-243.
[17] Tomas C, Pereira V, Morling N. (2012). Analysis of 12 X-STRs in Greenlanders, Danes and Somalis using Argus X-12.International Journal of Legal Medicine,126 (1) : 121-128.
[18] Zhang S, Zhao S, Zhu R, et al. (2012). Genetic polymorphisms of 12 X-STR for forensic purposes in Shanghai Han population from China.Molecular Biology Reports,39 (5) : 5705-5707.
[19] Samejima M, Nakamura Y, Nambiar P, et al. (2012). Genetic study of 12 X-STRs in Malay population living in and around Kuala Lumpur using Investigator Argus X-12 kit.International Journal of Legal Medicine,126 (4) : 677-683.
[20] Tillmar A O. (2012). Population genetic analysis of 12 X-STRs in Swedish population.Forensic Science International: Genetics,6 (2) : 80-81.
[21] hin S H, Yu J S, Park S W, et al. (2005). Genetic analysis of 18 X-linked short tandem repeat markers in Korean population.Forensic science international,147 (1) : 35-41.
入驻平台
回到首页
扫一扫,添加我们